Quote:
| Originally Posted by Unregistered The good thing is that the killer is getting charged with second degree murder.
Hopefully Jack and Andy can take some time away from boozing it up and send this family some flowers. |
i seriously doubt ole' andy and jackie will be sending anyone flowers to the poor victims familes. i didnt get any from him either.
and i am sure their atty's are on the case ready to offer up the 'minimium offer' and unless they have an smart lawyer (victims family) they should hold out for plenty if they have any 'cents' about them. but the erac attys will try to get this off the hook by saying this was not THEIR FAULT SINCE THEY WERE NOT DRIVING THE CAR!! REMEMBER VICARIOUS LAWSUITS? THIS IS ONE REASON WHY ERAC CAN NOT BE ALLOWED TO GET OFF THE HOOK EVEN THOUGH THEY RENTED THE CAR TO THE CUSTOMER AND SOMEONE ELSE WAS DRIVING. EVERYONE GET IT YET? THE DRIVER IS NOT GOING TO BE RESPOSIBLE FOR DOING THE DAMAGE. same case in point as in my own situation. the woman who hit me drove the car, but erac had to pay for the damages to my bodily injury. now, we have a case where some one stole the car and killed someone now using erac. did the customer BUY ALL THE WAIVERS FOR THE INSURANCE? MAYBE NOT BUT ERAC IS STILL ON THE HOOK PEOPLE. when you own a rent a car business IT DOESNT MATTER WHO IS DRIVING THE CAR> ERAC IS STILL ON THE HOOK AS THEY OWN THE CAR. my point is now hopefully understood