View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2006-06-26
Unregistered
Anonymous Coward
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: changes in group 43

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogladimgone
I have come upon information of a city manager firing in group 43. I will not name names suffice to say it is a long time in coming.

The skinny---
Apparently the rvp in group 43 was splitting the region into 3 cities instead of two. The rvp had been only going to hire two city managers (as there were 2 vacancies per my source) but decided to axe a long-term city manager because he liked a third candidate more than the one city manager he already had. Can you say loyalty?

Even though the city manager who was fired deserved it in my opinion, I still point out how vicious this firing was. It's nice to see that Branch managers in group 43 aren't the only ones being screwed by managemant. This sounds like a hell of good way to let someone go.

The only positive of this is that this person had it coming for all of the injustices that she inflicted upon so many other employees.

As I have said before, sooner or later, we all have to look in the mirror. I wish I could have been that mirror on Wednesday morning.

Good luck toady... I am sure you will need it.
Here is the Skinny. Chip had decided to split the cities from 2 to 3 that much is correct. He interviewed a batery of candidates, and decided he like two, First he offered JR a position. Then when he still liked the other AP, he went ahead and offered the current Group Rental Manager a bloated severence to get her out of the picture quietly. So he did hire two.

But I disagree with you, KL was an awesome city manager, and when she left the whole city went down hill pretty fast. Way to go Chip, way to put that magic touch on it.
Reply With Quote