Quote:
| Originally Posted by FailingEnterpriseAdmin I'm curious about this effect. I suspect recruiters are starting to hear from candidates about FailingEnterprise, and I'm sure they've got a ready-made script to read in hopes of persuading the candidate to ignore us. But who is a candidate more likely to believe? A recruiter or 10,000 message board postings from their peers?
I was hoping that pressure from observant customers would convince them to change their ways, but if it takes pressure from candidates who wouldn't want to work for a company that does this stuff, then that's fine also. Maybe recruiters are the ones who will convince management to clean up their act.
As soon as Enterprise makes the changes they need to, I'll be glad to boast about them here on FailingEnterprise. In the mean time, it's got to be discouraging trying to recruit with that pesky Internet out there...
Admin |
You have postings...big deal. Postings are not a reflection of the effect this "site" is having...sorry. We're losing potential candidates that we would have spent over $20,000+ on to train only to have them fired or quit because they sucked anyway? We're losing employees that Area Managers and RRM's are probably just dying to let go anyway...again because they suck? All and all, you probably ARE doing a good thing. Saving us a lot of money training these idiots on the front end and saving us a huge headache on the backend.