Question For Slave No More

Originally Posted by Locked and Stocked

Don't feel bad for calling the Admin out for being a fruit cake. What's the worst he could do? Sue you? Oops!!! Watch out Slave! You could be next to go under ?????'s mighty boot.

?????, is Jesus Fucking Christ Bitch gonna come on the stands to testify against John Watie? Or will it be Robert? Seriously Admin, you need to get a fucking gripe.

My husband works for ERAC. I've been invited to happy hours but I rarely go because it gets boring. I used to all the time, but after a while I realized that if I couldn't talk about ERAC, no one wanted to have a conversation with me.

About the hooking up: there is so much of that going on in our area. It shocks me how many married employees are cheating on their spouses w/other employees. It makes me scared to let my husband go to work. I understand that the SVP of the region loves the gossip and all that BS and encourages it by discouraging the inviting of spouses to HH's, planning LOTS of "mandatory" spouseless events, and spreading the gossip.

And the meetings in Orlando every year? I know of SO many married people who cheat on their spouses there every year. It's sickening.

Originally Posted by Please Read!

My husband works for ERAC. I've been invited to happy hours but I rarely go because it gets boring. I used to all the time, but after a while I realized that if I couldn't talk about ERAC, no one wanted to have a conversation with me.

About the hooking up: there is so much of that going on in our area. It shocks me how many married employees are cheating on their spouses w/other employees. It makes me scared to let my husband go to work. I understand that the SVP of the region loves the gossip and all that BS and encourages it by discouraging the inviting of spouses to HH's, planning LOTS of "mandatory" spouseless events, and spreading the gossip.

And the meetings in Orlando every year? I know of SO many married people who cheat on their spouses there every year. It's sickening.

Do you think the WSJ will ever use this place as a reference? Please, get off the Admin's balls.

Originally Posted by Please Read II!

Do you think the WSJ will ever use this place as a reference? Please, get off the Admin's balls.

Here's something to think about. Rental agencies buy what 2 million cars between them every year? They sell about 10% of them back to the public right. So what about the other 1.8 million where do they go? You got it used car dealers. SO when it comes down to it, if the used car you are buying didn't come from a private owner it was probably a rental.

Originally Posted by Locked and Stocked

Don't feel bad for calling the Admin out for being a fruit cake. What's the worst he could do? Sue you? Oops!!! Watch out Slave! You could be next to go under ?????'s mighty boot.

?????, is Jesus Fucking Christ Bitch gonna come on the stands to testify against John Watie? Or will it be Robert? Seriously Admin, you need to get a fucking gripe.

graduated from a decent college and made considerably more than most of my peers in the first few years out."

Please man, spare usthe stuff we've already been told. When I worked at ERAC I probably made the least of all my -employed- friends. The quote above is something you just say to make yourself feel better. Even if you did make X amount more than the next guy your first couple years out of school, I bet he had X amount of hours more to go out and have a good time. On the upside, all of us have that Virtual MBA hanging up over the desk in the office. I can't even tell you how embarassing it was to tell people where I worked so don't come in here and try and preach the stuff quoted above like it's gospel. Sounds like ERAC sent you here anyway.

Originally Posted by Fuck E

Here's something to think about. Rental agencies buy what 2 million cars between them every year? They sell about 10% of them back to the public right. So what about the other 1.8 million where do they go? You got it used car dealers. SO when it comes down to it, if the used car you are buying didn't come from a private owner it was probably a rental.

True that!!

Do YOU think this site will ever be used as a point of reference for the WSJ. Slave no more seemed to think ????? was a little off for making such a claim.

What's your stance?

Originally Posted by Please Tell Me!!

True that!!

Do YOU think this site will ever be used as a point of reference for the WSJ. Slave no more seemed to think ????? was a little off for making such a claim.

What's your stance?

If we can just save ONE person from making the mistake we did by accepting the job, this site has served a valid purpose. It will save a lot of employee's aggravation, and hell, maybe even prevent some liver damage...or maybe a marriage!! My bet is this site is educating hundreds of potential hires monthly to avoid this deal at all costs....and for that Admin...this Bud is for you! (by the way....Sober for 956 days since that last erac happy hour and still going strong...LOL)

This site has so much activity from former employees compared to other companies because this company flat out SCREWS employees...and sells it to them like they are the best company ever created. It wasn't a normal work experience by any means. New college grads are taken advantage of BIGTIME....and people don't forget something like that. That is why there is so much anger in these posts. Employees got used and abused, turned and burned..., and we just dont want it to happen to others....PERIOD. Whether or not that was the original intention for Admin's website or not....you have to agree that there are A LOT of pissed off employees....more than a normal company. You are correct brainwashed eracer's..it's not normal that there would be this many former employees of a company complaining.....willing to spend personal time to bring their experiences to light, but I think many would agree with me that they ARE willing to do it because they were treated THAT BADLY by this company. I think their employment practices are BARELY legal.

Example: Whats the deal with "SALARY...plus overtime" anyway???? That makes NO SENSE! you are paid HOURLY...take your salary divided by 80 hours (bi monthly) and there you go...HOURLY...plus overtime. They just don't want to tell you that because it comes out to such a ridiculous wage per hour. You realize that resulted from an employment wage lawsuit too, right? Interviewee's...wanna have some fun??...try this: Have a branch manager explain to you IN DETAIL how overtime is calculated. Have them break it down....in detail. They can't! Don't let them off the hook. Keep asking them what the hourly overtime wage is. It is COMICAL and you will see what a joke this company really is. Even worse...there are a large percentage of managers that don't even know what their employees base pay levels are in general (lets forget overtime cause none of them know it) ...and these are the BRANCH MANAGERS...your potential BOSS

Hasn't anyone ever done the 100% handwritten contract; keeping it on the DL; then closing it out w/out putting a single thing in the computer?

That is 100% money in the pocket. Initially learned it from the GrandMaster of Robbing ERAC - John Gabore and his tricks were secretly spread among a rogue group of underground MT's all the way to a ferw BMs......most are gone but some i think are still at ERAC...and many have passed the tricks along to the new generations...

John; you are a legend and a great leader - we miss you

Originally Posted by slave no more

I was afraid I was going to be called out on some bullshit I posted here a while ago :-) I do and it was about ERAC going public (in one of those threads). I remember because I remember making the remark that the WSJ article would refer to Jeaho, Jesus Fucking Christ Bitch and another funny name as references for Enterprise's activities (such credible names)

Lemme get this straight. A grown man with a college degree thinks the WSJ would use an online, anonymous message board for references????

Ok, that's funny.

Originally Posted by You're Joking, Right?

Lemme get this straight. A grown man with a college degree thinks the WSJ would use an online, anonymous message board for references????

Ok, that's funny.

Yes it is! But don't admit to that here; you might get labeled an e-chimp for laughing at the Admin.

I mean, it's perfectly reasonable to say the WSJ would use a site like this as a reference point. And only a perfectly normal, rational person would honeslty believe something like that and say it with a straight face.

Sorry. I hope that didn't sound sarcastic.... I'm totally, 100% serious about what I wrote above.

Originally Posted by Body Bag Blues

Yes it is! But don't admit to that here; you might get labeled an e-chimp for laughing at the Admin.

I mean, it's perfectly reasonable to say the WSJ would use a site like this as a reference point. And only a perfectly normal, rational person would honeslty believe something like that and say it with a straight face.

Sorry. I hope that didn't sound sarcastic.... I'm totally, 100% serious about what I wrote above.

WHAT TYPE OF ON-LINE REFERENCE DO YOU MEAN???