Question For Slave No More

Originally Posted by slave no more

Nope. Good try though. Admin can confirm (of course people probably wont believe him) that Robert and I are not the same. Cannot remember a thread where I specifically "told him off" but have threads where we have agreed to disagree.

Robert, quit frontin'. We know it's you in wolves clothing.

Why would slave no more talk to himself then? Huh?

Originally Posted by slave no more

Nope. Good try though. Admin can confirm (of course people probably wont believe him) that Robert and I are not the same. Cannot remember a thread where I specifically "told him off" but have threads where we have agreed to disagree.

It is impossible to defeat someone in an online debate. Just as it is impossible to prove who is who or what is what.

[slave no more]

Originally Posted by The Battle Of L.A.

It is impossible to defeat someone in an online debate. Just as it is impossible to prove who is who or what is what.

Exactly. That is why it is not even worth trying to convince an anonymous person that another anonymous person is not another anonymous person. No point. I would hope that by judging the writing styles and seeing other threads and opinions the person has they would be able to tell the difference. If not then oh well.

Originally Posted by slave no more

Exactly. That is why it is not even worth trying to convince an anonymous person that another anonymous person is not another anonymous person. No point. I would hope that by judging the writing styles and seeing other threads and opinions the person has they would be able to tell the difference. If not then oh well.

Someone could bite another person's rhymes and style though, tru?

Originally Posted by COpycat Crimes

Someone could bite another person's rhymes and style though, tru?

Of course, bitin' my rhymes yo that aint slick I got you gold teeth marks all over my ****!

Originally Posted by slave no more

I do remember and I think the reason why ????? lets my posts be is because I don't "attack" or go after him personally or attack his integrity.

That's fair enough.

But, again, why do you think he deleted entire threads? The thread This Website Sucks was erased for no reason. It was an old thread, with almost 10,000 views.

Now it's gone.

And yeah, there was some posts that attacked him personally. Yet, there were many that were well thought out and only questioned his judgment. Besides, as far as assassinating characters goes, ????? can't get too upset; free speech is messy and sometimes bad things get said. ????? allows all kinds of shit slinging. But if some of it gets on him, he cries. That's not very mature in my book.

Originally Posted by slave no more

I do truly think he does this for change but I also do think his views are biased, one way and sometimes come from the P.O.V. of someone who has never been on the "other" side of the counter. We agree and then we agree to disagree.

Can't argue with this. And, since ????? wants high traffic and a fat registration list, he's even more likely to side with some one that claims to be a customer.

Originally Posted by slave no more

He reserves the right to delete threads and posts based upon his own opinion. Do I think its right? I could care less honestly but I don't think all of his deleted threads go against the TOU (actually the free speech part kind of gets me)

Sorry to cut you off like that; your run-ons are frustrating at times.

I kid!

I hear this, too. I don't give a shit. ERAC could prosper forever or crumble tomorrow and I wouldn't care. Same with this site.

But, I think it is funny that the Admin is a glaring hypocrite and refuses to admit it.

Originally Posted by slave no more

but I think he deletes threads that take away from the integrity and character of the website if that makes sense. He wants this to be a site going against Enterprise the company and not a tell all about certain employees,

Originally Posted by slave no more

who fucks Latin children and some of that other nonsense.

I kinda like those threads. ????? says that he doesn't delete posts that name drop or the like because it could be true. Then I started seeing posts popping up that said that he fucks children.

The irony is that we cannot verify it, nor would ????? admit it if it was true anyhow. I know it's not true, but it was funny to see that rebuttle get filled with holes. ????? could monitor this site (he did when it was on EZ Board). He doesn't because the traffic would drop, like the time he made people register to post. That lasted about a month . . . like many people told him it would.

That was due to Crisco, I believe. I'm sure you remember. ????? has also deleted the Message to Crisco thread as well, so you can't see it for yourself.

Originally Posted by slave no more

He wants there to be validity behind this website and if ERAC upper levels are looking at the site for "ideas" to change seeing 80% of the drivel posted on here (and I can be guilty of that after some Newcastle) why would they think there was any credibility to anything said on the website?

Well . . . I'd say it's more like 90% drivel. And yeah, Newsweek and USA Today have already shot devistating holes in ?????'s credibility. And if two publications know this, ERAC does, too. Do they look at this site? Of course. Do they have a Plan of Action if ????? were to get to powerful? Yes indeed.

But, since the majority of the content here is mindless gossip or idiots challenging other people to races over the web, I don't think ERAC will ever have to implement their Plan.

See, many people that question ????? are seen as Green Machines. And in all reality, many could be. However some simply question ????? because they feel he's doing an inadequate job and then trying to cover it up. Having worked for Enterprise and knowing the type of creatures that thrive there, I'm always able to spot slip-shop work.

And Admin is a beacon.....

[slave no more]

Sorry about the run on sentences. I get into this mode and just type until I am done. No paragraphs, indentations or anything. It's annoying yes but this isn't english class (not mad I know I do it). Never saw anything about teh USA TOday or Newsweek articles if there are links I would like to see them about ?????. The funny thing is that Free speech was created not for the internet, radio or tv but for people who want to stand outside and preach against the government, corporate america or "evil" and not have it muffled by the govt. It gives people the right to gather and speak freely against what they deem "evil" for lack of better terms. It's funny to hear people use that as an excuse to do whatever they do (I love Stern but he does it all the time) and honestly Freedom of Speech does not cover what he does.

[Robert]

It's your world Slave. We are only renters.

Originally Posted by slave no more

Sorry about the run on sentences. I get into this mode and just type until I am done. No paragraphs, indentations or anything. It's annoying yes but this isn't english class (not mad I know I do it). Never saw anything about teh USA TOday or Newsweek articles if there are links I would like to see them about ?????. The funny thing is that Free speech was created not for the internet, radio or tv but for people who want to stand outside and preach against the government, corporate america or "evil" and not have it muffled by the govt. It gives people the right to gather and speak freely against what they deem "evil" for lack of better terms. It's funny to hear people use that as an excuse to do whatever they do (I love Stern but he does it all the time) and honestly Freedom of Speech does not cover what he does.

The USA Today and Newsweek articles are on the front page, beneath the picture of the Enterprise in San Francisco that "forced" ????? to start this site.