the final on enterprise's insurance

Grover is 100% correct. I can't believe the amount of mis-information about this topic that is posted on this site. Everyone claims to be an expert in this area but most just don't understand it.

When I worked as a BM I remember how pissed off I was if a renter returned a car with damage and they took the CDW. Especially if they only took it for a couple of days. Our waiver was about $15/day, so we got $30 but the car had $5,000 damage.(the brach now pays out about $420 month added to their damage reserves which decreases the branch profit) Selling CDW is a gamble and much like operating a Casino. The odds are in ERAC's favor over the long term but they take some nice hits along the way. The unfortunate for a BM and Asst't M that gets paid on a branch is if they get a big CDW hit it hits their pockets more directly where an Area Manager for Group Manager that gets paid on other branches they have more room to absord that hit in their paycheck.

[iluvEcars]

yeah i used to feel bad collecting gas and doing dx's but not really anymore... its not a good feeling though but i did offer the coverage.. i love customers who say well they never offered cdw haha....

yes cdw is high but think about if u total that thing out? how does erac pay for that? through cdw revenues

oh and very well wrote post...

Originally Posted by iluvEcars

yeah i used to feel bad collecting gas and doing dx's but not really anymore... its not a good feeling though but i did offer the coverage.. i love customers who say well they never offered cdw haha....

yes cdw is high but think about if u total that thing out? how does erac pay for that? through cdw revenues

oh and very well wrote post...

Written. Very well WRITTEN post.

Nobody cares about his grammar shit face! Get a life.

Originally Posted by Learn English

Written. Very well WRITTEN post.

It was a joke. He used bad grammar because the post he responded to used bad grammar.

Originally Posted by Unregistered1

It was a joke. He used bad grammar because the post he responded to used bad grammar.

Fine. But the "joke" is getting VERY old.