U4's disciplinary record

great comeback tosser. I am just stating fact through my experience in the police.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

great comeback tosser. I am just stating fact through my experience in the police.

ooooh! shes upset!

miaow!

Originally Posted by uphillgardener

ooooh! shes upset!

miaow!

I think she is. I am willing to bet it is that thick git CU. He used to work in one of the Hull branhces I think. I heard he does tht volunteer police thing. That guy sounded thicker than a loaf of warburtons.

[FailingEnterpriseAdmin]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I think she is. I am willing to bet it is that thick git CU. He used to work in one of the Hull branhces I think. I heard he does tht volunteer police thing. That guy sounded thicker than a loaf of warburtons.

That guy sounded thicker than a loaf of warburtons.

Could somebody please tell me what this means?

[EX-Heathrower]

Warburton's is a type of thick English bread!

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I Left ERAC in december last year and now worl as a police officer for west yorkshire police. It is good to have an employer which respects you in your job and pays half decent money.

James Allen
formerly U409 and U430

well done Pig

Originally Posted by Unregistered

the use of the disciplinary hearing is based (in u4 anyway) on the following criteria ;
1) how much CM/GM ass did you kiss?
2) how is your branch/area/dept performing?
(pass "go" and collect £200.00 if its performing well- you have nothing to worry about!- do what and how you like!!)
3)How is your branch/area/dept staffed? if you are just understaffed, you may be in danger (unless points 1 or 2 get you a blind eye turned), if you branch is understaffed to the point of having no staff, again, you will be OK!

*please note- ignore all precedent set by previous Disciplinary's you may have heard about...if working in U4 has taught me anything it is that consistency is NOT in the dictionary..the best guide to action being taken really is points 1,2,3 above.

DISCLAIMER ;- THE AUTHOR ACKNOWLEDGES THAT POINTS 1,2,3 ABOVE ARE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF U4 GM /CM, TAKEN FROM THEIR OWN GUIDELINES WHEN MAKING THE DECSION TO LAUNCH A WITCH HUNT..OH SORRY.... A DISCIPLINARY ACTION.

now that is some funny (but accurate!) shit!!

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Enterprise seems to be completely saturated with this culture of lying to get your needs met.


Your completely right! The whole U4 group is built on empty promises! (ie lying) The management, right down from GM, CM, AM, BM and even AM's at times will promise their staff the world and deliver nothing! The whole management team is full of ass kissing green robots! The only ones that wern't have left or are about too!

PDF wonders why so many people are getting out of the place? He's promoted a bunch of lying ass kissing gimps, that no one respects or wants to work for!

very accurate!

Originally Posted by u4 employee

i cannot beleive that you get a disciplinary hearing after the second accident!- it might not be an accident-it might be a £75.00 scuff, but the company see fit to put an employee thorough this experience. are they idiots? what do they think they gain? -- they only lose the motivation and loyalty of the employee. I can totally understand if you have had 3 accidents ( not very minor damage navigating the minute unlit car park at the branch), but the current policy is rubbish. it is so unfair that it encourages dishonesty, ie- people not admitting to damage- this surley works against everything?

nice one ?.This company would suck the shit out of it's own ass if they could make a profit !!!!!!!!!!!!.

[FailingEnterpriseAdmin]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

nice one ?.This company would suck the shit out of it's own ass if they could make a profit !!!!!!!!!!!!.

Thanks for the visual on that...