All Muslims Are Not Terrorists, But All Terrorists Are Muslims

[Baller1]

Originally Posted by Steve Williams

You have to admit that Robert has done a pretty good job of documenting his case. I have not read all of this because it is long as a freakin' novel, but he has made some strong points, I'm just sayin'.

I am not saying he is not coming up with articles about the terrorism, just the fact that he accuses anyone who doesn't share his view to be a terrorists supporter or backing the enemy, is a bunch of crap. And if that doesn't work he calls people Muhammed. Pretty much wipes out all his work in regards to his article posting.

[Robert]

Originally Posted by Baller1

I am not saying he is not coming up with articles about the terrorism, just the fact that he accuses anyone who doesn't share his view to be a terrorists supporter or backing the enemy, is a bunch of crap. And if that doesn't work he calls people Muhammed. Pretty much wipes out all his work in regards to his article posting.

The stories are true and it really burns your ass, doesnt it? Feel free to find documentation that refutes any story I have put in this thread though if it makes you feel better, LMFAO!

[Baller1]

Originally Posted by Robert

The stories are true and it really burns your ass, doesnt it? Feel free to find documentation that refutes any story I have put in this thread though if it makes you feel better, LMFAO!

Doesn't really bother me, I have never seen anyone putting so much energy into posting news articles on a rental car forum.

[Robert]

Originally Posted by Baller1

Doesn't really bother me, I have never seen anyone putting so much energy into posting news articles on a rental car forum.

I will continue to post stories of radical Islamic terror on this thread, especially now since I know ignorant people like yourself cannot defend it or refute it.

[Robert]

Originally Posted by Baller1

I am not saying he is not coming up with articles about the terrorism, just the fact that he accuses anyone who doesn't share his view to be a terrorists supporter or backing the enemy, is a bunch of crap. And if that doesn't work he calls people Muhammed. Pretty much wipes out all his work in regards to his article posting.

Hate Speech?

(Not According to CAIR)





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Muslims are the vilest of animals…”

“Show mercy to one another, but be ruthless to Muslims”

“How perverse are Muslims!”

“Strike off the heads of Muslims, as well as their fingertips”

“Fight those Muslims who are near to you”

“Muslim mischief makers should be murdered or crucified”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hate speech? Incitement to violence? Sounds like it to us, but a knowledgeable Muslim would have to disagree.

Why would Muslims not consider this to be hate speech? How is it that we can post these quotes with full certainty that CAIR won't be contacting the media (or Congress) with wild-eyed accusations of Islamophobia?

Well, for one thing, we don’t actually agree with any of these statements, of course. But the real reason is that Muslims themselves honestly believe these quotes to be the literal, eternal word of Allah. In fact, CAIR is promoting this hate speech on their own website! It is actively propagating the very literature that contains these comments, even while sanctimoniously claiming that it is working against hate and violence.

But… isn't CAIR a Muslim organization? What’s the catch?

Well, if you haven’t guessed it already, these are quotes from the Qur’an in which we've replaced the word ‘Christian’, ‘Jew’ or ‘unbeliever’ with the word ‘Muslim.’

Here is how they actually appear in the literature that groups like CAIR are pushing:


Sura (8:55) - Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve

Sura (48:29) - Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves

Sura (9:30) - And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah... Allah (Himself) fights against them. How perverse are they!

Sura (8:12) - I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them

Sura (9:123) - O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness

Sura (5:33) - The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement


These verses come from five different places in the Qur’an. There are dozens of others scattered throughout that advocate violence in open-ended fashion. There are hundreds more that speak of hatred and hell toward Christians, Jews, and other non-believers. (Is it any wonder that the Muslim world is split largely between those who tacitly support Islamic terror and those who do nothing about it?)

Very few of these verses are bound by historical context within the text of the Qur’an, and any appeal to external sources for mitigation would apply also to the tiny handful of verses that are used (disingenuously) to promote Islam as being loving and tolerant. More importantly, there are far more violent verses than ones of tolerance, and most were “revealed” later, thus abrogating the handful of earlier ones.

And yet, this is the book that CAIR wants people to read! This is what CAIR considers to be holy text, even to the extent that an exact replica of the Qur’an (grammatical errors and all) is said to be on a table in heaven guarded by angels.

So, the next time you hear CAIR smugly accusing its critics of “hate speech,” just remember what the organization's agenda really is:

They don’t mind hate speech directed at non-Muslims. In fact, they promote it.
They don't mind religious minorities being denied rights that Muslims have in Muslims societies. In fact, they plug fatwas and religious literature that encourage discrimination.

They don't even mind the vast amount of terrorism in the name of Islam. In fact, they refuse to acknowledge and denounce more than 99% of it, including the on-going genocide against black Africans by Arabs.


The language of civil rights and tolerance is merely a tool of convenience for prominent Muslim organizations in the West to advance the cause of Islamic supremacy. A true civil rights organization, however, is concerned about rights for all people, regardless of race or religion, and this is something that Islam has never been able to produce... and probably never will...

At least according to our Qur’an!

[Steve Williams]

Originally Posted by Baller1

I am not saying he is not coming up with articles about the terrorism, just the fact that he accuses anyone who doesn't share his view to be a terrorists supporter or backing the enemy, is a bunch of crap. And if that doesn't work he calls people Muhammed. Pretty much wipes out all his work in regards to his article posting.

Dude, give it up already. He's got your head twisted so bad that you don't even know what you are saying anymore.

[32AATopIPEandDub]

Originally Posted by Steve Williams

You have to admit that Robert has done a pretty good job of documenting his case. I have not read all of this because it is long as a freakin' novel, but he has made some strong points, I'm just sayin'.

Hahaha, wait wait wait... He grabs anything from google that shares his extremist simple-minded views, copies and pastes it, and you think he has great documentation of a case? His case is that he hates Muslims and minorities, supports deportation and white elitism, and thinks freedom is about grossly violating international law, taking people's rights away, and using fear as an instrument to achieve political means.

You haven't even read any of his pasted articles to realize that he didn't write of any it, yet you call that a good documentation of a case. You must have just been plagiarizing in English class your whole life.

[Sportin' Ravenwood]

Originally Posted by 32AATopIPEandDub

Hahaha, wait wait wait... He grabs anything from google that shares his extremist simple-minded views, copies and pastes it, and you think he has great documentation of a case? His case is that he hates Muslims and minorities, supports deportation and white elitism, and thinks freedom is about grossly violating international law, taking people's rights away, and using fear as an instrument to achieve political means.

You haven't even read any of his pasted articles to realize that he didn't write of any it, yet you call that a good documentation of a case. You must have just been plagiarizing in English class your whole life.

I have read some of his posts and there is alot from news services. Why would you get mad about news reports? That seems really silly.

[32AATopIPEandDub]

Originally Posted by Sportin' Ravenwood

I have read some of his posts and they there is alot from news services. Why would you get mad about news reports? That seems really silly.

I think it would be wiser for you to get your news source from academia. Mass media often only presents one side of the story and fail to present the truth. Weren't they in total supporting of invading Iraq for weapons of mass destruction, yet there was none?

The crimes of blacks and the terrorism of Islamic fascists does not mean we need to hate, discriminate, and deport all blacks and Muslims. That's the image that Robert is trying to portray. That is racial separatism and Nazism.

[Sportin' Ravenwood]

Originally Posted by 32AATopIPEandDub

I think it would be wiser for you to get your news source from academia. Mass media often only presents one side of the story and fail to present the truth. Weren't they in total supporting of invading Iraq for weapons of mass destruction, yet there was none?

The crimes of blacks and the terrorism of Islamic fascists does not mean we need to hate, discriminate, and deport all blacks and Muslims. That's the image that Robert is trying to portray. That is racial separatism and Nazism.

Again, where does he say that? I admit, I have not read every quote of his and maybe you have. Where does he say deport blacks for heavens sake? And you should post from academia to make your case. All you are doing is attacking without a real opinion. You are doing what you are accusing him of doing. You seem like a sensible guy, it should be easy for you to prove your points rather than attack another person.