All Muslims Are Not Terrorists, But All Terrorists Are Muslims

[Robert]

Originally Posted by FailingEnterpriseAdmin

Put down the crack pipe.

American men have gone through a feminization process for the last 40 years or so now where boys are told at young ages to be more "sensitive" and to explore their "feelings". Do you think the brave men from the World War 2 generation went to counseling sessions to discuss their feminine sides? Ritalin is another tool to supress the masculine and aggressive tendencies of boys. Why? To kill basic instincts such as aggression, fighting, and masculinity. Now we have a country of men who are politically correct, de-balled robots who cry out if some prisoners at Abu-Ghraib have some panties thrown on their head but don't say a god damn word when terrorists slit throats, fly planes into buildings, blow up civilians in Israel, or denounce all other religions but Islam. The silence from the New York Times is deafening when it comes to outlining the abuses women face in Islamic society. Where is NOW and other women's rights groups, to denounce this practice in the Middle East? It is not worth it to them politically so they stay out. Besides, isn't it more fun to blame Bush for everything anyway? He has been blamed for everything to the death of Jesus to the Titanic sinking to the Challenger shuttle explosion! It is kinda ironic how the homosexual mafia despises the president and Republicans. A homosexual in the islamic world would surely have his head removed because of his seuxal preference. The religious leaders think of America as the "Great Satan" because of our country's loose morals and attitudes. You would think the homosexuals and other sexual deviants would EMBRACE any war or conflict to eradicate the world of extreme Islamic beliefs since it is necessary to their survival. But the left doesn't and can't think in those terms. They only see WAR IS BAD. Sometimes the only way to make peace is war, doesn't sound good on the surface but if you are Israel you have 2 choices. Die, which is almost always a poor choice. Or fight, which gets criticized by the anti-semites out there who for some reason just can't stand to see a Jewish state exist. There has only been one Democrat elected to the presidency in the last 30 years who pulled more than 50% of the vote nationally (Jimmy Carter, 1976, 50.1%). Clinton might have eclipsed this amount if it wasn't for the meddling of H. Ross Perot in 1992 and 1996. You have to go back 40 years to find a Democrat who won by a sizable margin (Lyndon Johnson, 1964) and he has been regarded as possibly the worst President ever (by both parties). Despite what they think, the left is still outnumbered on a national scale because the people they run espouse too much hate for America. Blame America first doesn't play too well except in L.A. and New York maybe. I am hoping Hillary runs in 2008...let the games begin.

[Robert]

Originally Posted by toolazytologin

See? You once again failed to answer my points in a rational manner, because you're simply not smart enough. All you can do is scream "gay! gay!", I'll take that as an admission of defeat. Victory is mine.

Where is the word gay in the post?

[Robert]

Originally Posted by MarbleCheese

Were the terrorists of 9-11 from Iraq? No.
Was Iraq attacked? Yes.
Were the terrorists of 9-11 from Saudi Arabi? Almost all of them.
Was Saudi Arabia attacked? No.

So you are saying keep Saddam in power to continue his killing and brutality? Saddam was in violation of a slew of United Nations articles so you should really want him out because of that alone since most of you anti-war folks love the U.N. so much.

[FailingEnterpriseAdmin]

Originally Posted by Robert

American men have gone through a feminization process for the last 40 years or so now where boys are told at young ages to be more "sensitive" and to explore their "feelings". Do you think the brave men from the World War 2 generation went to counseling sessions to discuss their feminine sides? Ritalin is another tool to supress the masculine and aggressive tendencies of boys. Why? To kill basic instincts such as aggression, fighting, and masculinity. Now we have a country of men who are politically correct, de-balled robots who cry out if some prisoners at Abu-Ghraib have some panties thrown on their head but don't say a god damn word when terrorists slit throats, fly planes into buildings, blow up civilians in Israel, or denounce all other religions but Islam. The silence from the New York Times is deafening when it comes to outlining the abuses women face in Islamic society. Where is NOW and other women's rights groups, to denounce this practice in the Middle East? It is not worth it to them politically so they stay out. Besides, isn't it more fun to blame Bush for everything anyway? He has been blamed for everything to the death of Jesus to the Titanic sinking to the Challenger shuttle explosion! It is kinda ironic how the homosexual mafia despises the president and Republicans. A homosexual in the islamic world would surely have his head removed because of his seuxal preference. The religious leaders think of America as the "Great Satan" because of our country's loose morals and attitudes. You would think the homosexuals and other sexual deviants would EMBRACE any war or conflict to eradicate the world of extreme Islamic beliefs since it is necessary to their survival. But the left doesn't and can't think in those terms. They only see WAR IS BAD. Sometimes the only way to make peace is war, doesn't sound good on the surface but if you are Israel you have 2 choices. Die, which is almost always a poor choice. Or fight, which gets criticized by the anti-semites out there who for some reason just can't stand to see a Jewish state exist. There has only been one Democrat elected to the presidency in the last 30 years who pulled more than 50% of the vote nationally (Jimmy Carter, 1976, 50.1%). Clinton might have eclipsed this amount if it wasn't for the meddling of H. Ross Perot in 1992 and 1996. You have to go back 40 years to find a Democrat who won by a sizable margin (Lyndon Johnson, 1964) and he has been regarded as possibly the worst President ever (by both parties). Despite what they think, the left is still outnumbered on a national scale because the people they run espouse too much hate for America. Blame America first doesn't play too well except in L.A. and New York maybe. I am hoping Hillary runs in 2008...let the games begin.

Let's go easy on the gay-bashing here. I definitely don't put up with that here.

[slave no more]

Originally Posted by Robert

So you are saying keep Saddam in power to continue his killing and brutality? Saddam was in violation of a slew of United Nations articles so you should really want him out because of that alone since most of you anti-war folks love the U.N. so much.

You know the funny thing about this war and everything that it's about reminds me of a story I once read. It was about a bunch of white people who went to a country, saw it's agriculture, it's riches, it's natural resources and decided to take it all for themselves. They basically enslaved the people who were there and ironically they did not have white skin either. The white people pushed their religion and politics on the natives as well and decided that they would be better off living the way that they wanted them to. It was a real good book and was very realistic. The moral of the story is that Americans (previously Europeans) are the REAL cause of issues going on in the Middle East. We could still be paying 80 some cents per gallon for gas like back in the day if they did not get greedy and want it all for themselves. Just keep buying it like usual and back the fuck off of a country that has no issues with us. Arabs and Jews have been fighting for longer than this country has been around and they will continue fighting forever. It is not our business to be over there unless we are picking up oil and that is that. By the way, I read the book in history class for those who did not realize that I was talking about American History. Man white people suck (My mom is one).

I always get a kick when I see people arguing politics. That, along with religion are the two most commonly argued topics and coincidently the two primary things that over-complicate the world. In simplistic terms...they are both bullshit.

For me, politics are very simple. Look at Enterprise. They are a big business that is out for profit. They make business associates along the way for the purpose of building business relationships. They say they care about their employees, but in reality, they pretty much care ony about money and power. That's big business in simplistic terms. And politics is nothing more than big business.....just with a different title. It doesn't matter what political party you're in, it's all the same crap. Even if Bush wasn't president, the US would still be sticking its nose in some other country's business. The US is in Iraq for the goal of profit. They tell the American public that it's because Saddam was an evil guy as to the reason we went over. Saddam was an evil guy, but that's not why the US went over there. That's like when erac explains that the splitting of a larger branch into 2 or 3 smaller branches is growth...yet the cumulative fleet size remains about the same. Growth just sounds better than saying "we just wanted to cut mangement's pay." It's also like when ????? ??????? tells you that the purpose of this site is to help Enterprise correct itself and learn. Yet most of the postings are simply water cooler gossip. In reality, it's just an attempt to gain some notoriety and get some attention. The reason the admin likes to use just sounds more prestigious than the actual reason.

What's up Barr Barr? Any luck at the bars trying to use your logic on someone......

You liberals are a total joke you always look for reasons to assign blame. Saying "It's not totally there fault Israel is to be blamed as well." The only person or country that ever gets total blame is Bush. You guys have no problem assigning total blame to him for everything.
You guys are a total joke. If I punch one of you guys in the face than by your reasoning you guys are partially at fault as well after all it was your face in the way of my moving fist.................
If I'm punching someone else who cares you libs like to seem so smart, like you know everything. Ofcourse the second that I try to punch you in the face than I'm totallty at fault.

People like to say they are liberal because it makes them feel smarter. Like they can think on their own, or they know something that no one else knows.

[MarbleCheese]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Who bombed Pearl Harbor? It wasn’t Germany, but they were the bigger threat so we dealt with them first. By your rational we should have attacked Japan and left Germany alone. Sadam was a major supporter of terrorist and a danger to stability in that region of the world. Iran and Syria are next. They need to go to. Hillary Clinton said that we need to take the war to the terrorist where they live. Well, they live in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. Of that list, Iraq had the most dangerous military, Iran has the most dangerous weapons and Saudi Arabia has the ability to cripple the world economy. So we befriend the Saudi’s destroy Iraq’s military and put economic pressure on Iran to try to topple their regime. The remaining countries will go away when Iran and Iraq are free and no longer sponsor terrorism. Keep the fight over there. We lost too many people on 9/11 by letting them take the fight to us here. Since then they fight us over there with people that are trained and able to deal with them. If the terrorist want to kill Americans, let them try or die trying against the best we have to offer them. Not those who have no way to defend themselves.

And if the terrorist want peace all they need to do is quit fighting. We would not be there today if they were not the perpetrators of violence. We need to hunt them down and kill them like the rabid fucking dogs they are.

You make strong arguement - even if it is all messed up.

Saddam has been insignificant since the first Gulf War. The US and colalition forces crippled their army in the early 90's in about 45 days and ever since then there has been a No-Fly zone over Iraq that was patrolled by US jets which rendered Iraq virtually helpless. Also there have been strict trade restrictions that have not allowed any build up of weapons. And when the US invaded in the latest Gulf War, we are all aware of what they found - no chemical weapons, no WMDs - Nothing. He's was a bad man but not at all a threat. ( the 9-11 commision showed NO Iraq linked to the terrorists).
All but one or two of the 9-11 terrorists were Saudi born trained in Afganistan, the US was right to attack the Taliban in Afganistan but that battle was quickly abandoned. Your 'friend' in Pakistan are most likely helping hide Bin Laden along the border but you don't attack them because they have nukes. And no sense staying in Afganistan because Russia couldn't beat them in war in the '80s and there is nothing to gain. Back to Iraq.
Well at this point, the country is divided down the middle and on the verge of civl war, if you leave the likely result is that the country divides into 2 regions, (Sunnis and Shites) and they will be a Fundemental regime like Iran - therefore less free than the were under Saddam. Or you stay and brace for the political fallout (and destroy Bush's legacy) and more dead troops. Is an country occupied by the US free?

Follow the boucing ball - Bin Laden said 9-11 happened beacause he was pissed that US troops were on sacred Saudi soil on the road to Mecca. (not because they are jealous of your freedoms). The US has since pulled the troops from Saudi Arabia and they are building permanent camps in Iraq. (not Afganistan or Iran or Pakistan) The US needs troops in the area to 'stabalize' the region because of their dependency on oil. EAsiest place to go - Iraq. Why because he is an old enemy that we know is weak, therfore make a loose link to 9-11 and we invade. Plop down the troops and we have stabilized the regoin and protected our oil source. The problem is it wasn't as easy as it seemed...

Hillary said we need to take the war to the terrorist were they live, (assuming this is in reference to 9-11) the terrorists live in Saudi Arabia. As you said attacking Saudi Arabia would crippled the economy. Is the government really looking to make the world a safer place and go after them or is the world economy more important than the American people? I think we know the answer.

muslims are terrorists get them all shipped to pluto immediatly then they can bomb the shit out of each other in their own backyard and leave my aeroplanes alone piss off and die

[FailingEnterpriseAdmin]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

muslims are terrorists get them all shipped to pluto immediatly then they can bomb the shit out of each other in their own backyard and leave my aeroplanes alone piss off and die

Let's go easy with the broad stereotypes. No good can come from this.