Quote:
| Originally Posted by Unregistered This is just officers of the Missouri Corp office I believe. All the GM/VP's/RVP's in the field are officers also. Most likely a higher % of women and minorities will be found there. |
You would be wrong. There is 1 (ONE) African-American female RVP in the entire company. Out of 200+ regions, there is 1 (and shocker that she won an Exceptional Achievement Award in Orlando this year -- "GASP, we let one in and she is successful... what to do???"). That's all. I don't know how many African-American males hold that position, but it is not many. It is a white person's company. 2 years ago, the level 4 corporate officers that were white and male was 94.6%. That was only 2 years ago, how much progress do you actually think they have made since then? Get serious. Why do you think one of the 'core values' is "Our Doors Are Open"? They are openly trying to promote any and all minorities so they don't get sued again like they did in '01. The problem is, the minorities rarely stick it out in the company and leave (because they see the track record of promotions, or lack thereof, and get the hell out -- and can you blame them?).
In '01 ERAC actually had a conference call for every African-American in the entire company to discuss the class-action lawsuit they settled out of court for racial discrimination. That was fun explaining that one to the other employees. It looked like a walkout had been staged when all the employees went on the conference call. And the best part was they sent an MS01 to only African-American employees to inform them of the call. How long do you think it took corporate to compile that distribution list? Who in their right mind thought it would be a good idea to have a conference call for just one type of employee in the company? Let's see.... set up a conference call that excludes a portion of the workforce in order to discuss racial discrimination! What an oxymoron! They only perpetuated the environment they were trying to minimize by having the call in the first place! Idiots! And the discrimination case? It was for discrimination in promotions among minorities.
Don't be nice and give them the benefit of the doubt about their promotion practices in regards to minorities and females. Their track record speaks for itself. And like they love to say in upper management, "Past performance is indicative of future behavior."